Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Nasarawa State University, Keffi Nigeria

2 Department of Physics, Nigerian Army University, Biu, Borno State, Nigeria

3 Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.O. Box 5025, Akwa, Nigeria

4 Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, P.O. Box, 7267, Umudike, Abia, Nigeria

Abstract

The farmlands that were chosen in this work were four (4), which includes Nagari Farm (Gauta Keffi local government), Sharna farm (Abuja Road Karu local government), Gyunkas integrated farm (Kokona local government) and Gunduma farm (Kaduna road, Karu local government respectively. This research aimed at accessing some selected physiochemical properties of soil samples which includes pH of the soil, electric conduction (EC), totality of organic carbonate (TOC) and totality of organic nitrogens (TON). The physical and chemical characteristics of the samples of soil were examined using approved standards method for each of them. The result obtained in this study, showed that there is moderate acid in the soil and also, there are some matters that are organic in nature and ionisable materials. Overall results of both pH, EC, TOC and TON analysis of the soil samples investigated were within the standard limits of WHO and FAO.

Graphical Abstract

Assessment of Physiochemical Properties in Soil from Selected Farmlands in Nasarawa West Senatorial District, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. INTRODUCTION

Soil is an environmental system component used by man and other living organisms like plant animals, and microorganisms in terms of links between its properties, processes and other environmental components such as water, air, mineral elements and other abiotic components. The defined soil physical properties as the arrangement or grouping of individual soil particles into units forming a porous medium. Examples include texture of soil, content of matter that are organic in nature, EC, pH and moist contents [1].

pH of soil is understood to be among the principal factors that tells the metals concentration in the solution of soil, how they are available to plants as well as how they are mobile [1]. One of those things which hindered the mobilization of the heavy metal’s intensity is increase in the concentration of hydrogen ion [2]. For instance, mobility of Cadmium occored below pH value 6.5, while Pb becomes more active at pH value 4.00. All soils contain organic matter, however with considerably differences in amount and type [3]. Organic matter of soil is considered as soil fraction which composed of tissues of plant or animal in several breakdown level (i.e., decomposition) [4]. Material range of matters that are organic in soil are from the real plants and animals’ tissues to the mixture of materials that decomposed substantially which are called humus [5]. Organic matter particles have a net negative charge [6]. Soil organic matter has a superior influence on the soil chemical characteristics, and generally contain higher exchange capacity of cat ion. Exchange capacity of cat ion is a factor that measures the ability of soil to retain positive charged ions, giving a stronger metal cat ions adsorption [7]. Therefore, organic soils contaminated with heavy metals are more immobile and least bioavailable than metals in mineral soils [8].

  1. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Soil pH

The physicochemical properties of soil were examined using standards method that is approved each. pH of soil was measure as a proportion of 1:2:5 [9]. A 5g portion of air-dried sediments were weight using analytical balance and 25 cm3 of water (distilled) introduced and affiliated for 5 minutes and left the solution without disturbance for 1 hour. pH meter was utilized to take the record of the acidity or basicity by immersing the electrode in each of the solution of the sample. All readings were recorded.

2.2. Soil Salinity (Electrical Conductivity Procedure)

20g of soil was weighed into a 125cm3 beaker. 20cm3 of distilled water was added to the breaker and stirred with glass until well mix for about 30 minutes.

The EC of the soil suspension were measure at 25oC with conductivity meter. The conductivity meter probe was properly rinsed with distilled water before and after reading.

2.3. Total Organic Carbon (TOC)

Five grams (5 g) of the sample of soil were subjected for 30 minutes to heated at 20oC. The samples of the soil were later shake in water (distilled). The samples of the soil were pre-treated in acid (hydrochloric) in order to evaporate the carbon that are inorganic and pass the test over a catalyser to send out the acid that are carbonic with a non-carbon-dioxide and later quantify the solution. Shimadzu TOC-VCPH with a THM-1 Model and a sample changer, ASI-V was utilized for the test [10].

 

2.4. Total Organic Nitrogen (TON)

In examination for nitrogen through kjeldahls techniques 0.62g of compound that are organic was heated with acid (sulfuric). The nitrogen in compound that are organic was converted into sulphate (ammonium). The sulphate of ammonium formed was in turns subjected to heated with extras sodium hydroxide NaOH with ammonia liberation NH3, the result (ammonia) was absorbed in sulfuric acid solution that is standard.

The produced ammonia was estimated by quantity of acid (sulphuric) used for the reaction by estimation of the amount of acid (sulfuric) left after the absorbing ammonia via titration with solution of alkali that is standard.

The gap that exist between the initial quantity of acid (sulphuric) recorded and the amount that left after the reaction provides the amount of acid reacted with ammonia reaction.

  1. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Based on Table 1, Nike farm was recorded to have the superior value of pH of 5.79 with Gunduma farm having the least of 3.79 with arithmetic mean of 4.84 ± 0.66 and Percentage of CV as 13.6. pH value for control sample is 4.90. The results obtained in this study shows that the soil was moderately acidic. pH value recorded for the present work are in line with that reported by Osakwe, (2013) [10], but below the values reported by Matthews-Amune and Kakulu, (2013) [11]. At superior values of pH, phosphates of metal mineral and carbonates in metals formed and are not soluble whereas at inferior pH, they happen to be provided as free ionic species or a dissolved organo-metals and are bio-available [12].

 

Table 1. Physiochemical Parameters

 

Sample code

Depth

pH

EC

TOC%

TON%

1

A

0-15

5.20

6.92

0.89

0.05

2

B

0-15

4.80

5.45

0.01

0.03

3

N

0-15

5.79

8.37

0.61

0.61

4

D

0-15

3.79

5.52

1.47

0.02

5

E

0-15

4.62

4.90

0.81

0.02

 

Mean±SD

CV%

18.36±5.679

30.93%

2.296±0.604

26.30%

0.140±0.068

48.57%

0.067±0.013

19.40%

94.90±17.19

18.11%

A = Nagari Farm; B = Sharna Farm; C = Gyunka’s Integrated Farm; D = Gunduma Farm;

E = Nasarawa state university football field (control site)

 

A number of activities carried out by human harmfully affects the pH of close by sources of water. For example, if oxides of sulphur and that of nitrogen are produced, via operations by industries and vehicles, it may result to acid rain, and this makes water bodies acidic. Also, Pollution by chemicals, from industries and agricultural activities may pose acidity in soil and water bodies. Total nitrogen values differ from 0.02% to 0.61% with arithmetic mean of 0.15±0.23 and CV% of 153.3%. The value for the control sample is 0.02%. Through natural process like excess use of fertilizers, pesticides and lightening, decay of plant tissues, nitrogen may be induced into the soils. The total organic carbon in samples of soil from the entire locations varied as 0.61 % - 1.47 % with arithmetic mean of 0.95±028 and CV% 29.47. The value for control sample is 0.81%. The result recorded in the present work is lower compare those pointed out by Chaudheri, (2013) [13] and Tukura et al. (2007) [14] whereas superior compare to that of Idugbose et al. (2014) [15].

Total organic is a quantity of content of organic in soil and impact significantly to the soil acidity via organic acid and activities of biology via the metal’s appearance.

Based on Figure 1, Electric conduction (EC) of the samples of soil from entire locations ranged varies from (µs/cm) 5.45 -8.37 with a mean value 6.23±1.25 and CV% 20.1. The value for control sample is 4.90 (µscm1-). The results recorded in the present work is lower compare to that recorded by Badejo et al. (2013) [16] and Obasi et al. (2013) [17]. The values obtained in this study depicted significant presence of metal ions trace or materials that are ionisable in soil [18].

  1. CONCLUSION

The study has presented data on physicochemical features of samples of soil from selected farmlands across Nasarawa West senatorial district, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. The outcome of the physiochemical check of the samples of soil showed moderately acidic pH in the soil which composes of some substances that are organic and also substances that are ionisable and inorganic. More so, practices of farming affect the surrounding environment, which makes it vital to test some of the varying impacts that faming may pose on the environment like as change of land use and pollution by chemical.

The overall results for both heavy metals concentration and physio-chemical analysis of the samples of soil investigated were within the standard limits.

ORCID

Usman Rilwan

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3261-7086

  1. Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, Becerril JM, Amezaga I, Albizu I, Garbisu C. Recent findings on the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with environmentally toxic heavy metals and metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and arsenic, Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology; 2004 Mar; 3:71-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040059.70899.3d
  2. Ayodele OJ, Shittu OS, Balogun T. Heavy metal pollution assessment of granite quarrying operations at Ikole-Ekiti, Nigeria, International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis; 2014 Dec 19; 2(6):333-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140206.16
  3. Chaudhari KG. Studies of the physicochemical parameters of soil samples, Advances in Applied Science Research; 2013; 4(6):246-8. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:99616515
  4. Zingg F. Evaluate Long-Term Fate of Metal Contamination after Mine Spill; Assessing Contaminant Changes in Soil The Guadiamar Case Study; Southern Spain. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/195563306.pdf
  5. Muhammad S, Shah MT, Khan S. Health risk assessment of heavy metals and their source apportionment in drinking water of Kohistan region, northern Pakistan, Microchemical journal; 2011 Jul; 98(2):334-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.03.003.
  6. Bot A, Benites J. The importance of soil organic matter: Key to drought-resistant soil and sustained food production, Food & Agriculture Org.; 2005. https://www.fao.org/3/a0100e/a0100e.pdf
  7. Mengel DB. Fundamentals of soil cation exchange capacity (CEC). Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 1993. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ay/ay-238.html
  8. Olaniran AO, Balgobind A, Pillay B. Bioavailability of heavy metals in soil: impact on microbial biodegradation of organic compounds and possible improvement strategies, International journal of molecular sciences; 2013 May 15; 14(5):10197-228. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140510197
  9. Davey BG, Conyers MK. Determining the pH of acid soils, Soil Science; 1988 Sep 1; 146(3):141-50. ttps://journals.lww.com/soilsci/abstract/1988/09000/determining_the_ph_of_acid_soils.1.aspx
  10. Osakwe SA. Assessment of the effects of wood processing industries in selected parts of Delta State, Nigeria, on the soils and vegetation in their vicinities, Appl. Chem; 2013; 3(3):22-30. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59408981
  11. Matthews-Amune OC, Kakulu S. Investigation of heavy metal levels in roadside agricultural soil and plant samples in Adogo, Nigeria, Academic Journal of Environmental Sciences; 2013; 1(2):31-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.15413/ajes.2012.0123
  12. Prasad, M.N.V. Metals in the Environment: Analysis by Biodiversity (1st ed.). (2001). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482294583
  13. Englert N, Höring H. Lead concentration in tap-water and in blood of selected schoolchildren in southern Saxonia, Toxicology letters; 1994 Jun; 72(1-3):325-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(94)90044-2.
  14. Tukura BW, Kagbu JA, Gimba CE. Effects of pH and total organic carbon (TOC) on the distribution of trace metals in Kubanni dam sediments, Zaria, Nigeria, Science World Journal; 2007; 2(3). https://doi.org/10.4314/swj.v2i3.51743
  15. Idugboe SO, Tawari-Fufeyin P, Midonu AA. Soil pollution in two auto-mechanic villages in Benin City, Nigeria, IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol; 2014 Feb; 8(1):09-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/2402-08150914
  16. Badejo AA, Taiwo AO, Adekunle AA, Bada BS. Spatio-temporal levels of essential trace metals around municipal solid waste dumpsites in Abeokuta, Nigeria, Pacific Journal of Science and Technology; 2013; 14:682-92. https://www.akamai.university/files/theme/AkamaiJournal/PJST14_2_682.pdf
  17. Obasi NA, Akubugwo EI, Ugbogu OC, Otuchristian G. Assessment of physico-chemical properties and heavy metals bioavailability in dumpsites along Enugu-port Harcourt Expressways, South-east, Nigeria, Asian Journal of Applied Sciences; 2012; 5(6):342-56. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2012.342.356
  18. Fullen MA, Fearnehough W, Mitchell DJ, Trueman IC. Desert reclamation using Yellow River irrigation water in Ningxia, China, Soil Use and Management; 1995 Jun; 11(2):77-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1995.tb00500.x

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Usman Rilwan, Ibrahim Adamu Muhammed, Suleiman Madaki Kabiru. Assessment of Physiochemical Properties in Soil from Selected Farmlands in Nasarawa West Senatorial District, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, Adv. J. Chem. B, 6 (2024) 11-16

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ajcb.2024.410281.1182