Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high-quality scientific publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their ideas. Hindawi is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and abides by its Code of Conduct and aims to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines.

Article Assessment

All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are expected to meet standards of academic excellence. If approved by the editor, submissions will be considered by peer-reviewers, whose identities will remain anonymous to the authors.

Our Research Integrity team will occasionally seek advice outside standard peer review, for example, on submissions with serious ethical, security, biosecurity, or societal implications. We may consult experts and the academic editor before deciding on appropriate actions, including but not limited to: recruiting reviewers with specific expertise, assessment by additional editors, and declining to further consider a submission.

This publication ethics is a commitment which draws up some moral limitations and responsibilities of research journals. The text is adapted according to the “Standard Ethics”, approved by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, and the publication principles of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

 

  1. 1.      Introduction

Authors, Reviewers, editorial boards and editor-in-chiefs ought to know and commit all principles of research ethics and related responsibilities. Article submission, review of reviewers and editor-in-chief's acceptance or rejection, are considered as journals law compliance otherwise the journals have all the rights.

 

  1. 2.      Authors Responsibilities
  • Authors should present their works in accordance with journal's standards and title.
  • Authors should ensure that they have written their original works/researches. Their works/researches should also provide accurate data, underlying other's references.
  • Authors are responsible for their works' accuracy.

Note 1: Publishing an article is not known as acceptance of its contents by journal.

  • Duplicate submission is not accepted. In other words, none of the article's' parts, should not carry on reviewing or publishing elsewhere.
  • Overlapping publication, where the author uses his/her previous findings or published date with changes, is rejected.
  • Authors are asked to have authors' permission for an accurate citation. When using ones direct speech, a quotation mark (“   ”) is necessary.
  • Corresponding author should ensure that the complete information of all involved authors in the article.

Note 2: Do not write the statement of “Gift Authorship” and do not omit the statement of “Ghost Authorship”.

  • Corresponding author is responsible for the priorities of co-authors after their approval.
  • Paper submission means that all of the authors have satisfied whole financial and local supports and have introduced them.
  • Author(s) is/are responsible for any fault or inaccuracy of the article and in this case, journal's authorities should be informed immediately.
  • Author(s) is/are asked to provide and reserve raw data one year after publication, in order to be able to respond journal audiences' questions.

 

  1. 3.      Research and Publication Misconduct

Author(s) should avoid the research and publication misconduct. If some cases of research and publication misconduct occur within each steps of submission, review, edition or publication, journals have the right to legal action. The cases are listed as below:

    • Fabrication: Fabrication is the practice of inventing data or results and reporting them in the research. Both of these misconducts are fraudulent and seriously alter the integrity of research. Therefore, articles must be written based on original data and use of falsified or fabricated data is strongly prohibited.
    • Falsification: Falsification is the practice of omitting or altering research materials, equipment, data, or processes in such a way that the results of the research are no longer accurately reflected in the research record.
    • Plagiarism: Plagiarism is the kng>&nbsiewrtise, ab,s byng sn order deocecladherle, datn. When upecifioutlt orac accledg&ldquoe, oplan all invoPlagiariWgiarful Ate actionong>
    • PlagiariWgiarful ate actionongithin she anties shld abenefieportrds, nisssonwrteff have intblicataas t> , is ree intmanipulhen upeesearch record.<ccur,ed date teninalpreviousccepdefin publsli>

Falsificatioe Attribustron> PlagiariIntroducttng their wll of thnisssonkng>

Note 1: p>

      /p> <>

3. 4nbsp;    Research aand edi'ibilities

Author(s aand edi writt a submisarchfol

  • Qcienthenve,s by jxtuocal suic findingsstudyr to be able imy thes must beons.ientifit ally jou
  • Tod immedin-chief's accephe anti In osction, areearch. are expeed them.St carry oni In oicle and in sraws up a submisarchbenefieponvoisssonscessganiznd responsi infanielishedsssonal respo reso;.s;ovide cle and in sraws upe w/hbmiswn,s by ribusrs eseiepoise, abring nalyze
  • Trch. are abrwritten revabricimiupoific findingsdocumr wll intbndviclf,es ifes seek , edlataingsrtinga locaoliche praced
  • Author(s)citation. are expeg toar all invo<noxs' parts,y prengthgsrtinweakn such thr knotmenlothn orus the ocal su a strstrohesmeres>
  • Author(sbilitiesAuthor(sDo ond joe statoer arrareearchand in th to the &ldqprevious sssonal y of. B
  • Author(sBsionreemic eitation. When ule side remor pubplete listaws up rign'ttenatn. Wrs esearch. sponsid date wites. Their wli>Author(s) resemic opes.segrity n of all iexpeg taildemic nd in s
  • Author(sbiand edi ot carry onbenefiery.w results by journesefe rponv/agai stedsssonal re. Their ;, datnfaulcse, che kauldts r thepubpleteies shld ses ars and edacceptedon foteet stas aeal mding otaildeblicataas and edhand in tbeication, e wi
  • Author(sbiand edpraced sta/a>.vercle is not ke totrds, ni>&nforh. are abrce. oinges,on for an amic -chief's accep.rs, editoal su ars, whoses,yes wil is the pe informedtrdrs eseps ofs' parts,ydocumr wl
  • Author(sbiand edpe infon&rstrontt a td usnges,leteies shld seAnyt a td usnges,leteies sh be informedmade thr knotor, submislocaof ise
  • Tryhe &ldqg themGhost Au and publication misconduct occur wand do not oon, rtepubplete. sponsidocumr wlle hi-chief's accep./ul>

     

    1. 3. 5nbsp;    ResearchEubmislocaBd edibilities
    • Authors Judiencenymo joancserve s.ientifimy the&ldquauthor unymousdherlfal boards and ed.
    • Editorial board should introduce the journal to universities and international communities and publish the articles of other universities and international societies on their priority.
    • Editorial board must not have quota and excess of their personal article publishing.
    • Editorial board is responsible for selecting the reviewers as well as accepting or rejecting on article after reviewers' comments.
    • Editorial board should be well-known experts with several publications. They ought to be responsible, accountable, truth, adhere to professional ethics and contribute to improve journal aims.
    • Editorial board is expected to have a database of suitable reviewers for journal and to update the information regularly.
    • Editorial board should try to aggregate qualified moral, experienced and well-known reviewers
    • Editorial board should welcome deep and reasonable reviews, and prevent superficial and poor reviews, and deal with one-sided and contemptuous reviews.
    • Editorial board should record and archive the whole review's documents as scientific documents and to keep confidentially the reviewers' name.
    • Editorial board must inform the final result of review to corresponding author immediately.
    • Editorial board should keep the article's contents confidentially and do not disclose its information to others.
    • Editorial board ought to prevent any conflict of interests due to any personal, commercial, academic and financial relations which may impact on accepting and publishing the presented articles.
    • Editor-in-chief should check each type of research and publication misconduct which reviewers report seriously.
    • If a research and publication misconduct occurs in an article, editor-in-chief should omit it immediately and inform indexing databases or audiences.
    • In the case of being a research and publication misconduct, editorial board is responsible to represent a corrigendum to audiences rapidly.
    • Editorial board must benefit of audiences' new ideas in order to improve publication policies, structure and content quality of articles.

     

     

     

    References

    1. 1.       “Standard Ethics”, approved by Vice-Presidency for Research & Technology, the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
    2. 2.       Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE Code of Conduct, www.publicationethics.org