[1] A. T. Haglar, Quantum Derivative Fitting and Biomolecular Force Fields: Functional Form, Coupling Terms, Charge Flux, Nonbond Anharmonicity, and Individual Dihedral Potentials, J. Chem. Theory. Comput, 11 (2015) 5555-5572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00666.
[2] L. A. Rubenstein, R. J. Zauhar, R. G. Lanzara, Molecular dynamics of a biophysical model for β2-adrenergic and G protein-coupled receptor activation, J. Mol. Graph. Model, 25 (2006) 396-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.02.008.
[3] I. V. Alabugin, Stereoelectronic Interactions in Cyclohexane, 1, 3- Dioxane, 1, 3- Oxathiane, and 1, 3-Dithiane: W-Effect, σC-X ↔ σ*C-H Interactions, Anomeric Effect What Is Really Important?, J. Org. Chem, 65 (2000) 3910-319.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jo991622+.
[4] I. V. Alabugin, K. M. Gilmore, P. W. Peterson, Hyperconjugation ,Rev. Comp. Mol. Sci, 1 (2011) 109-141. https://doi. /org 10.1002/wcms.6.
[5] E. Juaristi, Y. Bandala, Chapter 2 - Anomeric Effect in Saturated Heterocyclic Ring Systems, Adv. Hetrocycl. Chem, 105 (2012) 189-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396530-1.00002-4
[6] E. Juaristi, R. Notario, Theoretical Evidence for the Relevance of n (F) → σ*(C–X) (X = H, C, O, S) Stereoelectronic Interactions, J. Org. Chem., 81 (2016) 1192-1197. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b02718
[7] Y. Mo, Computational evidence that hyperconjugative interactions are not responsible for the anomeric effect, Nat. Chem., 2 (2010) 666-671. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.721.
[8] K. B. Wiberg, W. F. Bailey, K. M. Lambert, Z. D. Stempel, The Anomeric Effect: It’s Complicated, J. Org. Che., 83 (2018) 5242-5255. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b00707
[9] C. Wang, F. Ying, W. Wu, Y. Mo, Sensing or No Sensing: Can the Anomeric Effect Be Probed by a Sensing Molecule, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 133 (2011) 13731-13736. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja205613x
[10] E. J. Cocinero, P. Carcabal, T. D. Vaden, J. P. Simons, B. G. David, Sensing the anomeric effect in a solvent-free environment, Nature, 469 (2011) 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09693
[12] E. Juaristi, R. Notario, Theoretical Examination of the S–C–P Anomeric Effect, J. Org. Chem, 80 (2015) 2879-2883. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo5029425
[13] A. R. Nekoei, M. Vatanparast, Generalized anomeric effect of α-chloro-O-oxime ethers; influence of various substitutions by DFT, NBO and AIM studies, Comput. Theor. Chem, 1029 (2014) 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2013.12.004
[14] L. E. Mrtins, M. P. Freitas, Anomeric effect plays a major role in the conformational isomerism of fluorinated pnictogen compounds, J. Phys. Org. Chem, 21 (2008) 881-885. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1397.
[15] MJ. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, G. Scalman, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H.P. Hratchian, A.F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J.A. Montgomery, J.E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J.J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K.N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J.C. Burant, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J.M. Millam, M. Klene, J.E. Knox, J.B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, R.L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V.G. Zakrzewski, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, et al. P a g e | 171 A.D., O. Farkas, J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D.J. Fox, Gaussian 09. Revision A.02 ed.; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2009.
[16] M. Loipersberger, L. W. Bertels, J. Lee, M. Head-Gordon, Exploring the Limits of Second- and Third-Order Møller–Plesset Perturbation Theories for Noncovalent Interactions: Revisiting MP2.5 and Assessing the Importance of Regularization and Reference Orbitals, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 17 (2021) 5582–5599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00469.
[17] L. Lu, Can B3LYP be improved by optimization of the proportions of exchange and correlation functionals?, Qantum. Chem, 115 (2015) 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24876
[18] Version 6 Gauss View, R. Dennington, T.A. Keith, J. M. Millam, Semichem Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS. 2016.
[20] N. Hayashi, T. Ujihara, H. Ikada, Interpretation of anomeric effect in 2-hydroxytetrahydropyrans based on extensive bond interactions, Tetrahedron, 76 (2020) 130919-130946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2019.130919
[21] Z. Mokhayeri, R. Fazaeli, Quantum Chemical Relationship between Generalized Anomeric Effect and Thermodynamic Parameters in M2Cl2 (M = O, S, Se), Russ. J. Inorg. Chem, 64 (2019) 1819-1824. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2016.1143984.
[22] Z. Mokhayeri, Investigation of Thermodynamic Properties and Hardness by DFT Calculations of S2X2 isomers (X: F, Cl, Br) , Chem. Methodol, 6 (2021) 52-58. https://doi.org/10.22034/chemm.2022.1.5.
[23] M. F. Perez and J. L. Gazquez, Electronegativities of Pauling and Mulliken in Density Functional Theory, J. Phys. Chem. A., 123 (2019) 10065-10071. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07468
[24] E. Chamorro, P. K. Chattaraj and P. Fuentealba, Variation of the Electrophilicity Index along the Reaction Path, J. Phys. Chem. A., 107 (2003) 7068-7072. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp035435y.
[26] Z. Mokhayeri, Evaluation of axial and equatorial conformation stabilization of compounds 1, 3-dioxane by DFT, Iran. J. Org. Chem, 13 (2021) 3209-3213.